Best Novel national language: the basis of hypocrisy or the source of stability each language represents a civilization and is a cultural phenomenon. Urdu is also the name of a civilization. A civilization that unites all the cultural groups of the beloved homeland like pearls in a garland. They are wrapped in a cord of feeling. The specialty of Urdu is not only that it is the most spoken and understood language in the country, it is also important that through it the different cultural groups of the country, with their individual phenomena, interact with each other in its wide circle. Can be close, can be harmonious. Thus emerges the scenario of unity which is our national identity and our hallmark.
Politicians have their own needs and interests, bureaucracies have their own problems. They both have their own attitude towards creating Urdu as the national language which keeps creating obstacles. There has been a lot of talk about it, it still happens, so there is no point in repeating it over and over again. The common man, however, can easily understand the fact that no matter what cultural group he belongs to, his strength and interests depend on his inclusion in the national mainstream. This involvement provides him with great opportunities both socially and economically. It opens up new avenues for him by removing many obstacles. Therefore, without any confusion or prejudice, he should understand that Urdu language is not the basis of hypocrisy for him, but the source of stability.Click here best urdu novels
One of the hallmarks of nations on the path to development is that whether it is a reference to their collective identity or a cultural phenomenon, it highlights their stability. This is possible only when the nation as a whole does not suffer from the disease of hypocrisy. Now what is this disease of hypocrisy? Hypocrisy is a disease that when a nation suffers from it, the relationship of the individual is cut off from its gathering. He remains a captive of his own caste. He becomes indifferent to his gathering from within, but he seems to be connected to it, but also anxious for it.
Hypocrisy afflicts a nation when its teachers and politicians neglect their duties and pursue their own interests. We do not need to go far to verify the veracity of this statement, it will suffice to examine our own national situation. Not only this, but also in the field of education or knowledge there is an abundance of ambitious and wealthy people.
Only thirty-five years ago, only those people were seen in this field whose nature was characterized by self-sacrifice and contentment. The purpose of his life was to spread the light of knowledge and to light new lamps of thought and consciousness. These people were not very prosperous financially, but their respect and dignity in the society was such that even people with high positions and very rich people did not stand in front of them with their heads held high. Could not
The rate at which good deeds are slowed down in a society is twice as high as the rate at which evil deeds are promoted. As a result, hypocrisy spreads like a contagious disease. At the moment, we are in the same situation at the national level. The situation is really sad, but it is also true that darkness has not yet completely overwhelmed us. Somewhere a ray wakes up, a flower blooms and cracks here and there in the darkness.
A voice comes tearing apart the snatches of indifference and a feeling of warmth runs through our national existence. The hope of life awakens again. Whoever of us has this experience and whenever, he should share it with others responsibly. It is essential for the spread of national consciousness, awareness of collective conscience and positive thinking. We have recently experienced this when the issue of national language was discussed. Many people commented or reacted to it. They included young researchers, teachers and students. How gratifying and encouraging it is to realize that in this modern world, where there are no more parrots that have spoken out about civilization, literature, language, history, and nationalism, there is no Maya’s voice is also heard. Not only is it audible, but many voices provide its gummy stuff to keep it from sinking and stabilizing.
Imagination on a national level is really a big thing. Because it becomes the greatest and most effective means of achieving the strength and stability of a nation. But it is also a fact that there are always opportunities for disagreement between living people and living society. Disagreement is not a bad thing, if it is aimed at the wider collective interest and reaching the best possible outcome. So if the question arises in the mind of a young person that there are less than 10% of the people in this country whose mother tongue is Urdu, then is it fair to impose this 10% language on the remaining 90%? Is?
Or if they feel that Urdu, like English, has its own elite and its own tantana, and non-speakers of the language are kept out here, or if anyone thinks that Urdu belongs to madrassas Therefore, now it is not the language of Pakistan but the language of terrorists, so we should listen to any such reaction or question with a cold heart and consider it without any annoyance. Before expressing one’s opinion, one should think about all its aspects and speak with the collective national interest in mind.
It is not correct to say that the language of 10% should be applied to 90%. Coincidentally, the census is being conducted in the country these days. New figures will be released soon. According to previous statistics, there are less than 10% of people in the country whose mother tongue is Urdu. These are ground realities that cannot be denied.
However, it should be seen that in the context of giving Urdu the status of national / official language, was its population ratio taken into consideration? Of course not. Because the proportion of such people in our country has never been seventy or eighty percent whose mother tongue has been Urdu. Therefore, numerical superiority can never be the justification for making Urdu the national language.
This can be seen not only in our country but also in many other countries where different cultural groups are found. For example, Russia, China and the United States. In all countries that are multicultural or multilingual, the national language is usually not determined by any numerical superiority. On the contrary, it is seen that the national language should be the medium through which communication between different sections of the society and all the cultural and linguistic groups is possible easily and widely.
Based on this principle, Urdu is rightly considered as our national language. From Karachi to Quetta, people in every part of the country speak and understand this language the most. In most parts of the country, people with different linguistic backgrounds do not use this language for expression and communication under any external pressure, but this process happens spontaneously.
Urdu is not popular in the country due to the power of government machinery, but because it is the easiest and most effective means of meeting the need for expression and communication at the national level. No other language spoken in the country fulfills this need so easily. All these languages are respected. Their participation enhances the diversity and prestige of the national mainstream. By colliding with each other, nothing can be achieved except anarchy. Every language, however, has an elite. This is the mother tongue class which has a kind of elitism at some level. Even today in France and Germany, this language elite is also seen there. English is the most spoken language in the world today, but it still has an elitism. We have the difference between American and British English and the attitude of English speakers towards it. We’ve been a British colony and we’ve had some good English speakers and writers from the British, but they can still be seen in the historical context of British behavior today.
At one time the language of the subcontinent’s elite and power was Persian. Nevertheless, such elitism was expressed in relation to the Persian writers and speakers of India. Visit here for more info and The words of a poet like Bedel are considered as Hindi style. Not only this, with the help of Insha’Allah we are also able to get the most out of this. The purpose of presenting all these examples is simply that what is called Urdu elite and its tantra, that class and behavior is found in more or less every language.
Therefore, it is not right to be offended by Urdu on the basis of such a reference. Secondly, the time has passed when the Urdu language was “Urdu Maali”. Now it is “Urdu Mohalla”. Today it is the language of the people without any discrimination. Thirdly, Urdu has opened its heart not only to power and elites, but also to poets and Sufis. The fact is that the color of his temperament is the most prominent and dominant part of his character today. Even these facts must be taken into account honestly.
To say that Urdu is the language of madrassas, therefore it is related to terrorists, is more noteworthy. Madrassas are not here today, they have been there for centuries and not in hundreds, but in thousands. There is no denying the fact that these madrassas have played a vital role in the survival of our civilization and language in the age of slavery. He has produced great people not only in jurisprudence but also in literature, philosophy, history and politics.
Today, if some of them have become tools or facilitators of terrorists, then we must recognize them and speak out against them. All madrassas should not be sworn in. It is also important to remember that terrorism is a global problem right now. Terrorism in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Egypt, Turkey, France and the United Kingdom has nothing to do with Urdu. The torment of terrorism, of course, we are also suffering, but its roots are not with us, that is, they are not in our language or civilization. That is why we should not do such things for Urdu or any of our other languages. This mental attitude will lead to corruption and fragmentation in our country. It will spread hypocrisy. At the same time, for national stability, we especially need national harmony and solidarity.
It is not just a matter of Urdu, whatever the language, its nature is not to create distance, it is the essence of bridging the gap. By bridging the gaps and alienations, it allows humans to get closer to one another. Gives them the opportunity to get to know, understand and share each other’s feelings. When man invented the language, his purpose was to reach the other person like himself by crossing the horrible and deadly deserts of silence. Language has a connection in its nature, not separation.